a-timey-wimey-orange

shadows-of-a-fallen-angel:

bloody-men-with-blue-eyes:

bripixiemonster:

lurea:

So here’s the thing:  Crowley is clearly demonic.  He was a son of a witch in 18th century Scotland, sold his soul, died, went to hell…Became a demon and then became King of Hell.

But he also had a ‘thing’ with Naomi in Mesopotamia.   Sooooo…couldn’t he be a fallen angel like Anna?  I mean, how did she know what to do?  Someone had to do it first, right?

So, Crowley…  You were an angel.  Became disaffected.  Ripped out your Grace.  Fell.  Was reborn as a human.  Learned magic.  Sold your soul.  Died, went to Hell and became a demon.  

And at some point, recovered all your memories.  Cool. 

I’m just going to leave this here.

WELL THAT EXPLAINS WHY MARK SAID THAT MAYBE CROWLEY WASN’T REALLY A DEMON

hamburgergod

littlehollyleaf:

dubiousculturalartifact:

This bit of dialogue makes me angry, because it was written by Robbie Thompson to be said in reverse (Dean saying he wanted to read the books), and J2 decided to switch it when it was filmed.
It just completely cheapens the line and makes it all about making fun of Dean’s perceived levels of intelligence, when the man is canonically a damn genius who reads stuff like Vonnegut and the Odyssey in his spare time…
It’s moments like this that make me wonder sometimes at the wisdom of letting J2 have as much control over scenes as they appear to. They are great actors, but they occasionally get stuck in the mindset of their characters in a way that makes them view the characters in a specific way. Character bleed is a powerful thing. Sometimes it leads to beautiful moments (Dean keeping the trenchcoat), but other times stuff just…
Gets lost along the way.

IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE REVERSED??

fuck me.

This line stuck out for me too, but I let it pass because I took it to be brotherly teasing, you know? Like, the inherent ‘truth’ behind it all is that Sam DOESN’T usually read fiction, hence Dean’s surprise/mocking, so Sam replies mocking/defensive via a joke implying Dean is the one whose fictional reading matter is low/simplistic, when Sam knows full well that’s not the case, he’s just screwing around… if you know what I mean? It’s like, a variation on the old schoolyard ‘you’re stupid’ - ‘I know you are but what am I?’ banter. It’s Sam not wanting to let Dean’s implication - that Dean is superior because he reads fiction and Sam doesn’t - lie, so he counters with a similar mocking implication of his own.

So yeah, my take away is that it’s just brothers affectionately being little shits to each other :p

BUT - I agree the other way round would have been better.

pookiepanda

chutzpadik:

chutzpadik:

there’s a clear and easily defined difference between emotional manipulation and needing attention and validation bc of a personality disorder. idk why neurotypical people have such a hard time grasping that???

literally nothing about needing affection is inherently manipulative, and it is vital to our safety. don’t u dare pretend it’s something we can control, or an excuse we use to manipulate all the people around us.